I visited Nagoya Castle and was extremely impressed (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagoya_Castle). I have seen the Forbidden City in China and a few castles in England. There seems to have been more attention placed on aesthetics above and beyond utility compared to other castles I have seen.
Good news for all those people who bought a 19-inch notebook computer in Korea but couldn’t find a computer bag. In response to the ruckus caused by my prior post (NO 19-INCH COMPUTER BAGS IN KOREA) the following store in South Korea now carries 19-inch computer bags:
Hyojin System
I Park Mall – next to Yongsan Station
7th Floor – next to the I Park Mall bookstore
Mobile 016-223-4398
Seoul, South Korea
As you can see in the photo above, my Samsung Sens 25 19-Inch Desktop Replacement system fits snug as a bug!
The bag itself is manufactured by Manhattan and says “Fits most Widescreen Notebook Computers” on the label but as you can see from the above picture, the bag can handle a 19-Inch notebook computer without any problem. The official name of the bag is Big Apple Notebook Computer Briefcase and the product number is 433723. The bag includes pen loops, ID/business card holder, digital device storage and file pockets. There is an adjustable storage strap. The bag is 100% polyester. The exterior dimensions are 36 x 46 x 11 cm (14 x 18.25 x 4.25 in). The bag has adjustable interior dimensions. The bag sells for 49,000 won which is around 50 bucks. 50 bucks is a good price for any computer bag much less one that is basically the only game in town.
According to the manager this computer bag is his best seller!
Congrats to Hyogin Systems for responding to the needs of the consumer.
I prefer Chinese food to Korean food overall but there are a few Korean specialties I do like. Barbecued clams are common at sea side or river side restaurants and a lot of fun to heat up and eat. The above picture was taken along the side of the Gapcheon river in Daejeon. We also had raw octopus.
The following study is an attempt to objectively explore the truism:
“Nice place to visit, but I wouldn’t want to live there”
The operational version of this truism would be that tourist cities and livable cities are different cities. The truism has been named the Visit/Live Theory for the purposes of this study. Two lists that rank cities were compared. The first list ranks cities according the number of tourists that arrived in a city.
The list and a description of the list can be found at:
The second list ranks cities according to livability. Mercer Human Resources looked at 39 quality of life issues including political stability, currency-exchange regulations, political and media censorship, school quality, housing and the environment.
The Mercer list and a description of the list can be found at:
Table 1 shows all the cities on both lists in alphabetical order. In addition, the difference in rank was calculated for each city when this was possible. If a city was on only one top 100 list then the difference in rank could not be calculated. The tourist destination study looked at 150 cities, but for the purposes of comparison, only the top 100 tourist destinations were used in this study. Many cities were only on one list and not on the other list. The number of cities on both lists was counted. The number of cities only on one list was also counted. If the number of cities on both lists was greater than the number of cities not on both lists then this would suggest the truism is not true.
Top 100 Cities: Tourist Destination vs. Livability Rank
Table 1: Alphabetical List of All Cities
Cities
Country
Tourist Rank
Livability Rank
Rank Difference
1
Abu Dhabi
UAE
52
88
36
2
Adelaide
Australia
NR
30
N/A
3
Agra
India
99
NR
N/A
4
Amsterdam
Netherlands
18
13
5
5
Antwerp
Netherlands
90
NR
99
6
Athens
Greece
NR
78
N/A
7
Atlanta
USA
NR
66
N/A
8
Auckland
New Zealand
NR
5
N/A
9
Bahrain
Bahrain
12
NR
18
10
Bangkok
Thailand
2
NR
90
11
Barcelona
Spain
10
41
12
12
Beijing
China
22
NR
N/A
13
Benidorm
Spain
33
NR
N/A
14
Berlin
Germany
34
16
18
15
Bern
Germany
NR
9
N/A
16
Birmingham
United Kingdom
81
55
26
17
Boston
USA
68
36
32
18
Bratislava
Slovakia
NR
99
N/A
19
Brisbane
Australia
NR
32
N/A
20
Bruges
Belgium
89
NR
N/A
21
Brussels
Belgium
NR
14
N/A
22
Buenos Aires
Argentina
NR
79
N/A
23
Budapest
Hungary
36
74
38
24
Cairo
Egypt
45
NR
N/A
25
Calgary
Canada
NR
24
N/A
26
Cancun
Mexico
26
NR
N/A
27
Cape Town
South Africa
57
85
28
28
Chennai
India
97
NR
N/A
29
Chicago
USA
64
44
20
30
Chongquing
China
100
NR
N/A
31
Cleveland
USA
NR
59
N/A
32
Copenhagen
Sweden
54
11
43
33
Dalian
China
87
NR
N/A
34
Detroit
USA
NR
64
N/A
35
Dubai
UAE
7
80
73
36
Dublin
Ireland
11
27
16
37
Dusseldorf
Germany
NR
5
N/A
38
Edinburgh
United Kingdom
56
NR
N/A
39
Florence
Italy
46
NR
N/A
40
Frankfurt
Germany
NR
7
N/A
41
Geneva
Switzerland
98
2
96
42
Glasgow
United Kingdom
82
55
27
43
Granada
Spain
95
NR
N/A
44
Guangzhou
China
32
NR
N/A
45
Guilin
China
65
NR
N/A
46
Hamburg
Germany
83
24
59
47
Hangzhou
China
49
NR
N/A
48
Helsinki
Finland
77
30
47
49
Hong Kong
China
5
70
65
50
Honolulu
USA
NR
27
N/A
51
Houston
USA
NR
68
N/A
52
Istanbul
Turkey
16
NR
N/A
53
Johannesburg
South Africa
NR
90
N/A
54
Katsuyama
Japan
NR
73
N/A
55
Kobe
Japan
NR
40
N/A
56
Krakow
Poland
69
NR
N/A
57
Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
15
75
60
58
Kunming
China
94
NR
N/A
59
La Havana
Cuba
70
NR
N/A
60
Las Vegas
USA
48
NR
N/A
61
Leipzig
Germany
NR
67
N/A
62
Lexington
USA
NR
51
N/A
63
Limassol
Cyprus
NR
NR
N/A
64
Lisbon
Portugal
47
47
0
65
Liverpool
United Kingdom
91
NR
N/A
66
Ljubljana
Slovenia
NR
80
N/A
67
London
United Kingdom
1
39
38
68
Los Angeles
USA
31
55
24
69
Luxembourg
Luxembourg
NR
18
N/A
70
Lyon
France
84
36
48
71
Macau
China
27
NR
N/A
72
Madrid
Spain
17
42
25
73
Manchester
United Kingdom
73
NR
N/A
74
Marrakesh
Morocco
50
NR
N/A
75
Mecca
Saudi Arabia
19
NR
N/A
76
Melbourne
Australia
72
17
55
77
Mexico City
Mexico
30
NR
N/A
78
Miami
USA
39
62
23
79
Milan
Italy
42
49
7
80
Minneapolis
USA
NR
60
N/A
81
Monterrey
Mexico
NR
94
N/A
82
Montevideo
Uruguay
NR
76
N/A
83
Montreal
Canada
85
22
63
84
Moscow
Russia
21
NR
N/A
85
Mumbai
India
86
NR
N/A
86
Munich
Germany
40
8
32
87
Nagoya
Japan
NR
54
N/A
88
Nanjing
China
76
NR
N/A
89
New Delhi
India
92
NR
N/A
90
New York City
USA
6
48
42
91
Nice
France
61
NR
N/A
92
Nurnberg
Germany
NR
23
N/A
93
Oahu/Honolulu
USA
44
27
17
94
Omuta
Japan
NR
69
N/A
95
Orlando
USA
38
NR
N/A
96
Osaka
Japan
NR
42
N/A
97
Oslo
Norway
NR
26
N/A
98
Ottawa
Canada
NR
18
N/A
99
Panama City
Panama
NR
92
N/A
100
Papeete
French Polynesia
NR
97
N/A
101
Paris
France
3
33
30
102
Perth
Australia
NR
21
N/A
103
Pittsburg
USA
NR
52
N/A
104
Portland
USA
NR
46
N/A
105
Port Elizabeth
South Africa
NR
97
N/A
106
Port Louis
Mauritius
NR
77
N/A
107
Prague
Czech Republic
20
72
52
108
Qingdao
China
79
NR
N/A
109
Riga
Latvia
NR
92
N/A
110
Rio De Janeiro
Brazil
35
NR
N/A
111
Rome
Italy
8
61
53
113
St. Louis
USA
NR
64
N/A
114
San Juan
Puerto Rico
NR
71
N/A
115
Salvador de Bahia
Brazil
71
NR
N/A
116
Salzburg
Austria
74
NR
N/A
117
San Diego
USA
88
NR
N/A
118
San Francisco
USA
37
29
8
119
Santiago
Chile
NR
83
N/A
120
São Paulo
Brazil
62
NR
N/A
121
Seattle
USA
NR
49
N/A
122
Seoul
South Korea
9
87
78
123
Seville
Spain
60
NR
N/A
124
Shanghai
China
13
100
87
125
Shenzen
China
41
NR
N/A
126
Singapore
Singapore
4
34
N/A
127
St. Petersburg
Russia
25
NR
N/A
128
Stockholm
Sweden
66
20
46
129
Suzhou
China
59
NR
N/A
130
Sydney
Australia
43
9
34
131
Taipei
China
24
81
57
132
Tallinn
Estonia
67
89
22
133
Tianjin
China
75
NR
N/A
134
Tokyo
Japan
51
35
16
135
Toronto
Canada
14
15
1
136
Tsukuba
Japan
NR
55
N/A
137
Tunis
Italy
NR
95
N/A
138
Valencia
Spain
93
NR
N/A
139
Vancouver
Canada
NR
3
N/A
140
Varadero
Cuba
53
NR
N/A
141
Venice
Italy
28
NR
N/A
142
Victoria
Seychelles
NR
95
N/A
143
Vienna
Austria
23
3
20
144
Vilnius
Lithuania
NR
82
N/A
145
Warsaw
Poland
29
85
56
146
Washington DC
USA
63
44
19
147
Wellington
New Zealand
NR
12
N/A
148
Winston Salem
USA
NR
52
N/A
149
Wuxi
China
96
NR
N/A
150
Xi’an
China
78
NR
N/A
151
Xiamen
China
80
NR
N/A
152
Yokkaichi
Japan
NR
63
N/A
153
Yokohama
Japan
NR
38
N/A
154
Zhuhai
China
58
NR
N/A
155
Zurich
Switzerland
55
1
54
NR, no rank, no top 100 rank in this category
N/A, not applicable since the city was on only one of the lists
Table 2 below shows cities that were on both lists ordered from the least difference between ranks to the greatest difference between ranks.
Top 100 Cities: Tourist Destination vs. Livability Rank
Table 2: Comparison of Ranks
Cities
Country
Tourist Rank
Livability Rank
Rank Difference
1
Lisbon
Portugal
47
47
0
2
Toronto
Canada
14
15
1
3
Amsterdam
Netherlands
18
13
5
4
Milan
Italy
42
49
7
5
San Francisco
USA
37
29
8
6
Dublin
Ireland
11
27
16
7
Tokyo
Japan
51
35
16
8
Oahu/Honolulu
USA
44
27
17
9
Berlin
Germany
34
16
18
10
Washington DC
USA
63
44
19
11
Chicago
USA
64
44
20
12
Vienna
Austria
23
3
20
13
Tallinn
Estonia
67
89
22
14
Miami
USA
39
62
23
15
Los Angeles
USA
31
55
24
16
Birmingham
United Kingdom
81
55
26
17
Glasgow
United Kingdom
82
55
27
18
Cape Town
South Africa
57
85
28
19
Paris
France
3
33
30
20
Boston
USA
68
36
32
21
Munich
Germany
40
8
32
22
Sydney
Australia
43
9
34
23
Abu Dhabi
UAE
52
88
36
24
Budapest
Hungary
36
74
38
25
London
United Kingdom
1
39
38
26
New York City
USA
6
48
42
27
Copenhagen
Sweden
54
11
43
28
Stockholm
Sweden
66
20
46
29
Helsinki
Finland
77
30
47
30
Lyon
France
84
36
48
31
Prague
Czech Republic
20
72
52
32
Rome
Italy
8
61
53
33
Melbourne
Australia
72
17
55
34
Warsaw
Poland
29
85
56
35
Taipei
China
24
81
57
36
Hamburg
Germany
83
24
59
37
Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
15
75
60
38
Montreal
Canada
85
22
63
39
Hong Kong
China
5
70
65
40
Dubai
UAE
7
80
73
41
Seoul
South Korea
9
87
78
42
Shanghai
China
13
100
87
43
Geneva
Switzerland
98
2
96
Conclusion
There were a total of 155 cities on either list. 112 cities were only on one list. Only 43 cities were on both lists. Cities that are only on one list outnumber cities on both lists 2.6:1. Even for cities on both lists, the mean difference between ranks was 37.6 and quite high. These findings suggest that cities that are visited are not the same cities that are more livable. The truism that some cities are nice places to visit and different cities are nice places to live in is correct. Table 2 showed which cities had the least difference between ranks and the greatest difference between ranks.
The city with the least difference in rank was Lisbon. Lisbon had a rank of 47 on both lists. Toronto had the second least difference in rank and has the honor of having a relatively high visitor rank (14) and livability rank (15). Amsterdam showed a similar pattern to Toronto with a visitor rank of 18 and a livability rank of 13.
Geneva had the greatest difference in rank. Geneva is a great place to live (2) but doesn’t get very many tourists (98) relative to other cities. Shanghai had the second greatest difference in rank but in the opposite direction as Geneva. Shanghai is a city that many tourists visit (13) but only ranks 100 in terms of livability. A practical implication for expats is to be wary of deciding to live in cities you like to visit without taking the Visit/Live Theory into account.
The above picture is from one of my favorite Twilight Zone episodes: A Nice Place to Visit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Nice_Place_to_Visit). I have been in Asia for about ten years now and occasionaly wonder if I am in a similar Twilight Zone episode. The main point of the story is that fun, fun, fun can be fun but ultimately not very fullfilling and deadly at the existential level.
I am in the process of moving from Daejeon, South Korea to Nagoya, Japan and ended up having a heated debate with a fellow expat about how Nagoya compares with other cities in the world. My friend loves expat forums and I do not! I think expat forums are dominated by those expats that have an axe to grind and are overly negative. The negativity can be a source of a self fulfilling prophecy. You read all this negative stuff. You then talk negatively about your host country without realizing what you are doing and this in turn creates even more negative experiences since the locals don’t like a person who has a negative view of their country.
I decided to try to find some objective data to settle this debate and the following is the result of my research. What I found out is that there are not as many international lists as you would think. There are far more lists comparing US cities than lists comparing cities around the world. I have traveled a bit in my life and lived in six countries (https://foxhugh.wordpress.com/countries-visited/) and based on this experience have decided that one place you have to start when comparing cities is to recognize that there are places worth visiting and places worth living in and these are two very different things. As a tourist you want fun, fun, fun! Tourist attractions and an active night life are the two things you focus on as a tourist. You don’t tend to focus on such mundane issues as pollution, unless its really over the top, or transportation.
Crime is of course a big issue for both the visitor and the person living in a city and any time a tourist is robbed and killed then that cities tourism is going to take a big hit. Comparing cities that are fun to visit with cities that are fun to live in is like comparing apples and oranges. First time expats often don’t make this crucial distinction and decide to live in cities that they like to play in during their vacation and upon living in that city are terribly disappointed. This is a common expat tale of woe. The best list of city destination is at:
This list is based on the raw data of how many international visitors arrive at a city and this can be considered a very objective list.
The thesis of this post is that living in a country is very different than visiting a country and I think the best list of this sort is compiled by Mercer Human Resources that looked at 39 quality of life issues inculding political stability, and currency-exchange regulations, political and media censorship, school quality, housing and the environment.
Nagoya is ranked 54th on this city and compares very favorably with Taipei (83) that I lived in for five years. I am not surprised that the fourth largest city in Japan has a far higher ranking than the capital city of Taiwan.
A quick comparison of the two lists uncovers the archetype of the sort of city I love to visit but wouldn’t want to live in. Bangkok! Bangkok is number two on the visit list and not of the live list at all! I have been to Bangkok several times and I absolutely agree with both lists. Bangkok is fun, fun, fun! I am kind of the Asia expert for my friends and family back in the US and when they ask me where to go in Asia I always say Bangkok without any hesitation whatsoever.
If you can’t have fun in Bangkok then you can’t have fun anywhere!
But! And this is a big but, Bangkok is terribly polluted, getting from point A to point B is a major problem, toss in the occasional coup, and extreme currency fluctuations and you have a place that I love to visit but would never live in. Well never say never! In my newbie days as an expat I would have jumped at the chance at a job in Bangkok and some of that enthusiasm is still there. I would have to make a very conscious decision that Bangkok is A in some areas but maybe a D in many very basic areas that are only important if you live in a country. Of course there is the grade point theory of life and if you add an A (4 points) to a D (1point) then you yield an average of 2.5 or C+ and there are plenty of cities that are way below a C+ thats for sure! The grade point theory of life is of course the polar opposite of a balanced life style and people who live by this philosophy often go mad!
I think there is something to be said for a city that is on both lists. You have a city that meets your living needs but is also a destination that friends and family will find interesting and I for one do like visitors! What cities are in the top 100 of both lists? I will deal with this issue at the following page in a study:
Daejeon has a very unique topography. There are several giant rivers that run through the city and generally the city has walk ways and bike ways on either side of the rivers. This creates giant patches of green that criss cross the city for miles and miles. Like most cities in South Korea and unlike Seoul, Daejeon has shopping areas surrounded by miles and miles of rows and rows of apartment complexes. The shopping centers are not special and just serve the daily needs of the persons in the surrounding area. Kind of like giant convenience stores. The rivers and river walks are set below the street level. You take stairs to go down to the river so you have this very strange experience of being surrounded by green but looking up concrete towers on either side. At one point of the river walk there were reeds as tall as me to my right and tons of dragon flies around me. The river walk itself was totally clear of plants and debris and an easy walk. There were tons of wild flowers. I saw giant storks. There were birds in formation flying over head. The river itself was probably at least 500 feet wide and the expanse of green on either side was at least a couple of thousand feet but just above the concrete aparment complexes looking down at the river with disdain. There was an extreme contrast between the river walk and the surrounding concrete apartment complexes.
I walked all the way to the Daejeon Expo Park. In the picture above you can make out a giant yellow ballon and that is one of the exhibitions of the park. From where I started walking the yellow ballon was a speck that was barely visible. I had often seen the Expo Park from the bridge near my house but realized it would be quite hike. The weather was cooler tonight than usual so I went for it and glad I did.
I am writing this post from Han’s Diner at the entrance of the Expo Park! I guess I will get a taxi home.
Why in the world wouldn’t you want to be a werefox? I was born a werefox and let me assure you that its great fun and much more fun than being a mere human.